Zenger’s editing philosophy is based on the editorial standards of The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg. We seek to provide a consistent reader experience in which thoughtful sources on both sides of a story’s central conflict are presented fairly and accurately.
A reader should come away from a Zenger story with enough information to argue both sides of a question and see what facts or arguments are driving a debate. It promotes understanding, not picking winners and losers.
The lede requires the most work from our editors. We aim to seize the reader’s attention in the first 17 words and vividly present the central conflict in a way that’s engaging, surprising, or amusing.
A reader should know, from the lede alone, what the central conflict is and who the main characters are on both sides. It should use simple and striking words, not jargon, acronyms, or clichés.
Every Zenger story must include characters (real-life people on both sides of an issue who are interesting and distinct); conflict (an issue that is dividing the public, officials, experts, or participants); and context (the history of the conflict, as well as the physical and emotional setting and motivations of the participants). Eyewitnesses and decision makers make the best sources.